Sahil v. State Of Haryana And ANR





 


   
      
 





 !

!"#$# % &&

 &&&&& ! # # %!'

  

&&&&& !$( %)!% $
 * + & ,
 ,   + 

           

  !  !

  """""

 

   #   

$

$  %  

&'( )*+  ,
-
+  

  ., . +
+/-0 '

,0- 

$ 

 1   2  1  Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations in the instant FIR qua the present petitioner are totally vague from whom niether any recovery of weapon has been effected nor any direct injury has been attributed to him and as such, there is no incriminating role assigned to the present petitioner for implicating him in the FIR in question. He in support of his assertions, also refers to the statement of the co-accused Raj Kumar dated 04.12.2023 (Annexure P-7) wherein the accused had admitted that he along with the petitioner had hit on Mohan's head with a vegetable cutting knife, which was subsequently got recovered.

Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has produced the copy of the custody certificate, which is taken on record and he does not dispute the DINESH BANSAL 2024.02.29 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.





 


 In the light of above, since nothing is attributed to the present petitioner except accompanying the co-accused Raj Kumar and the fact that the investigation is already complete and challan stands presented on 23.01.2024 and 

   

 $3  

 



4 % 

%

$  

%  %







 4

% 

 5  4           $

  

  



  
   '   %

3 $ 

%  

 4 

 $ 5 $3   6 

 





   !

" #$%&# '



'(%)%

'  4 %

 

 

 % 

 



$  % 

 $%

%    

 7 $   $  



  # 

 



% 4  -,   +.

&&

 
 9 



$8

    :

8) 9 



 %

 :

8) DINESH BANSAL 2024.02.29 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh