Poonam v. State Of Haryana And ORS
CWP-5377-2019 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP-5377-2019 Date of decision: - 28.02.2019 Poonam ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) In the present writ petition, the claim which is being made by the petitioner is that she was entitled for regularization of her service w.e.f. 01.04.2011 when the same benefit was extended to her junior. Counsel for the petitioner prays that once the benefit of regularization has been extended to junior of the petitioner, the same should be extended in her case as well.
Counsel for the petitioner further states that for the relief which has been sought in the present writ petition, the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 05.03.2018 (Annexure P-7) to the respondents, which is still pending consideration with them and the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the said representation. NARESH KUMAR 2019.03.07 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-5377-2019 -2In view of the request made, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the claim being made by the petitioner, the respondents are directed to decide the representation dated 05.03.2018 (Annexure P-7) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case after the decision, it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any monetary benefit, the same shall also be released to her within a period of next three months.
Present writ petition stands disposed of.
( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) February 28, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?
Yes Whether reportable?
No NARESH KUMAR 2019.03.07 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh