Bhavneet Walia v. State Of Haryana And Another
IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH 129+203 ) -.
./
351
," "
"""6 0121
3
"""173 1
&
"
#$%&!
&
% Mr. %&'(($ )* Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Ha aryana.
% '
#"
(( )
+ ,)
) )*+, +$(* *(-*
) )*+
+ .*&* ) -./ /* * 0
3 - 4$ 1 * %
2 $ 2 !
"
$
$ /*
5 *$
$+ * * + 0 25; #
#
#
$
/*
6 5 * / /(& $.
*2 ) $ * * - - 0
$+ **
* * * * + + * * /* < <)+ $ * + * + +$) #7
3 - 4 : *$
/ * )* /* *
*$ )* *9$:
5 ) * * ) ** "
=
* * )
* /* *
* * $ 5 *
)
0+ + * 0 *
**+ * > > $ )
#6
$ * + + + * ) *& )$ * *
=
$ * +* )*&-* *+(
+ * # :+)$ + #6
$ *
+
$+ + * +
#? * * :*$ + * ) ) /*
4 $ + *$* # 0
) ** ** + *
; * **Gura appa 1969 CriLJ 826 and Shokat Ali Gugal and d others Vs. State of Mysore : 1 i Vs.
State of H Haryna : 2020(2) RCR (Crimin al) 339. More so, while adjourn ning the case to o 22.08.2014 since the mandatory y period of 30 days had not elap psed, the trial l learned Court failed to conside er the fact that * ) - ( ** + 0 * + * * *
* + # ;*
*-*& & '( (
* + ,'
"
#$
%%
,
** $ ) + * ) + + + )* $ - - .+
3 - - 4$ 1 *
%
2 $2
!
"
$
$ /*
5 *$ + * * $ 0 + * 0 * (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE ," "
Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable Yes/No