← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/13254/2016disposed of

Kanika Pamma And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2016-04-19Mr. Justice A.B. Chaudhari2 pages

CRM-M No.13254 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.13254 of 2016 Date of decision : 19.4.2016 Kanika Pamma & another .......Petitioners Vs.

State of Punjab & others ........Respondents ****

CORAM:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia Present:- Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners **** G.S. Sandhawalia, J. (Oral) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents since they have married each other against their wishes. 2.

It has been averred that the petitioner No.1 is major and her date of birth is in the year 1997 as per Aadhar Card (Annexure P/1) and the petitioner no.2 is also major and his date of birth is 10.3.1993 and in support of the said, copy of matriculation certificate issued by the Punjab School Education Board is attached as Annexure P/2. The petitioners have got married on 15.4.2016 as per Hindu Rites at a Mandir at Panchkula. The marriage ceremony photographs are appended as Annexures P-3. The petitioners are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents, who are parents/relatives of petitioner no.1 as they did not approve the marriage of the petitioners. A representation dated 16.4.2016 (Annexure P-4) had also been made to respondents no.2 ventilating their grievances and apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.

PRADEEP KUMAR ARORA 2016.04.19 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M No.13254 of 2016 After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the veracity of the age and validity of the marriage, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to respondents No.2 to look into the representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action in accordance with law in view of the law laid down in Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another 2006(2) SCC (Criminal) 478, if required.

The petition stands disposed of.

(G.S. Sandhawalia) 19.4.2016 Judge Pka PRADEEP KUMAR ARORA 2016.04.19 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh