Krishan Kumar Sharma v. State Of Haryana
CRM-M-13182 of 2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1.
CRM-M-13182 of 2018 Date of Decision: 28.05.2018 Krishan Kumar Sharma ....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana ....Respondent 2.
CRM-M-13666 of 2018 Charanjit Singh ....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana ....Respondent 3.
CRM-M-13961 of 2018 Raghubir Singh Dhanda ....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present:
Mr. Karandeep S. Sidhu, Advocate for Mr. Parvez Chugh, Advocate for petitioners in CRM-M-13182 & CRM-M-13961 of 2018. Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-13666-2018.
Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl. A.G. Haryana.
******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Present petitions have been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioners in case FIR No. 07 dated 20.06.2014 registered for offences punishable under Sections 406/409/420/467/468/471/120-B and 13 (1) of Prevention of Corruption Act, at Police Station State Vigilance Bureau, Panchkula. Jitender Kumar 2018.05.28 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-13182 of 2018 -2Heard.
Learned State counsel submits that Tilak Raj, the main accused, in this case is already on bail. The police after completion investigation has presented the challan against him in Court. Petitioners have also joined the investigation and their custodial interrogation is no more required for further investigation of the case.
In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, these petitions are allowed and order dated 20.04.2018 passed in these petitions is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against them so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) that petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.
(iv) that petitioners will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.
May 28, 2018 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2018.05.28 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH