Jitender v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-4587-2026 Date of Decision: 25.03.2026 JITENDER

...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Anshul Khurana, Advocate and Mr. Saleen Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to give him new electricity connection.

2.

Learned counsel for the respondents No.2 to 4 at the outset submits that petitioner has committed default in paying electricity charges and he has remedy to approach Corporate Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum for the redressal of his grievance.

3.

On being confronted with aforesaid statement learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach Corporate Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.25 15:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-4587-2026 -24.

Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 5.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE March 25, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.25 15:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document