Raj Kumar Aggarwal v. Rajesh Kumar




    
         Date of decision: 4th March, 2016  Raj Kumar Aggarwal Petitioner

Versus

Rajesh Kumar Respondent  !  "#  $
  $
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

 $
%

#  In spite of repeated pass/overs, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner, which was the situation even on the last date of hearing. This being the second consecutive default, reflects that the petitioner is no more interested in pursuing the present petition, and thus the same stands dismissed for non prosecution.

 $
    &'()% *
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.03.04 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court