Surender v. State Of Haryana




    
       Date of decision: 17th March, 2015  Surender  Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana  Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana with SI Suresh Kumar

 !
"#  $ It is submitted on behalf of the learned State counsel Mr.Deepak Sabharwal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana on instructions from SI Suresh Kumar, Police Station Julana, District Jind that vide judgment dated 11.03.2015 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jind all the accused in this case have since been acquitted, and thus, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed having been rendered infructuous.

#  !
$   %&'()"  
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.17 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court