Rimpy v. State Of Punjab




    
      Date of decision: 17th March, 2015  Rimpy  Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab  Respondents        
  
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Ramandeep, Advocate for Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab with ASI Makhan Singh.



 
!"

# Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.217 dated 24.07.2013 registered at Police Station Dinanagar, District Gurdaspur under Sections 328/363/341/342/1207B/376/506 IPC. Vide order dated 15.01.2015 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioner was granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.
Learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Makhan Singh, submits that the petitioner has since joined the investigation RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.17 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

 and is no longer required for further investigations and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 15.01.2015 is made absolute till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, the petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. With these observations, the present petition stands disposed off.

"

 
#   $%&'(!   RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.17 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court