← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/12413/2015disposed of

Daljit Kaur And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2015-04-21Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 12413 of 2015 Date of Decision: 21.04.2015 Daljit Kaur & another ......Petitioners Vs State of Punjab & others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH

Present:

Mr. T.P.S. Bhatti, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral) Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for issuance of directions to official respondents to protect their life and liberty from the hands of private respondents.

Petitioners claim themselves to be major and have solemnized marriage against the wishes of their parents on 19.04.2015. Factum of marriage has been pleaded with reference to marriage certificate and photographs (Annexures P-3 and P-4 respectively). Petitioners feel reasonable apprehension at the hands of private respondents, who were opposing their marriage. Precisely, for the grievance made in the present petition, petitioners have already filed a representation before Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar-respondent No.2 (Annexure P5), but no action has been taken so far. SATYAWAN 2015.04.21 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 12413 of 2015 -2Notice of motion.

At this stage, Mr. Arshdeep S. Kler, D.A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of State. Let three copies of the petition be supplied to him by learned counsel for the petitioners during the course of the day.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar- respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation made by the petitioners (Annexure P-5) and if required, necessary protection be provided to them if they are not required in any unlawful activity. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. 21.04.2015 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) 'sp'

JUDGE SATYAWAN 2015.04.21 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh