Surjit Singh Etc. v. Municipal Corporation Chd.Etc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.17324 of 2001(O&M) Date of Decision: 23.09.2024 Surjit Singh and others ....Petitioners vs.

Municipal Corporation Chandigarh and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. R.K.Gautam, Advocate for the petitioners *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking to regularize their services pursuant to policy decision dated 18.06.1996 of Chandigarh Administration. 2.

By order dated 31.10.2001, the writ petition was admitted and it was further ordered that status quo regarding services of petitioners shall be maintained. As per record, the aforesaid order has not either been vacated by this Court or Supreme Court of India.

3.

Mr. R.K.Gautam, Advocate submits that he is not aware about present status of petitioners.

PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.09.23 05:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.17324 of 2001(O&M) -24.

A period of 23 years from the date of interim order has passed away. There is no representation on behalf of the respondents and Mr. R.K.Gautam, Advocate is not having instructions. 5.

In the wake of aforesaid facts, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to petitioners to move an appropriate application, if cause survives.

6.

Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 23.09.2024 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.09.23 05:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document