← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/12156/2021dismissed

Tejinder Singh Alias Rulda v. State Of Punjab

2021-08-19Mr. Justice Raj Mohan Singh2 pages

CRM-M No.12156 of 2021(O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.12156 of 2021(O&M) Date of Decision:19.08.2021 Tejinder Singh @ Rulda .....Petitioner Vs State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:Mr.Jasjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Amar Ashok Pathak, Addl., A.G., Punjab.

Mr. Vishva Bahl, Advocate for the complainant.

**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral) The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

Petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.0040 dated 15.02.2021 registered under Sections 457, 380, 201, 188 IPC and Section 15 of the Indian Medical Council Act at Police Station Jadiala, District Amritsar.

The allegations are that the shop in question was being run by the petitioner, which was sealed by the team constituted by Civil Surgeon. On 01.02.2021, backwall of the shop was PRINCE SAINI 2021.08.23 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.12156 of 2021(O&M) found to be broken and theft was committed. Empty boxes of medicines were found lying near the backwall. Medicines lying in the shop were removed. By this act, only the petitioner is beneficiary as he is running the shop where the raid was conducted.

At this stage, the plea of the petitioner that he is working as RMP cannot be appreciated.

In my considered opinion, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required in the present case. The present petition is found to be totally devoid of merits and is dismissed as such. (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) 19.08.2021 JUDGE Prince Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PRINCE SAINI 2021.08.23 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document