Hari Singh v. Tejinder Singh And Others



101/2 CRM-A-31-MA-2007 HARI SINGH VS TEJINDER SINGH AND OTHERS

Present:

Mr. Sudhir Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Akshay Kumar, AAG, Punjab.

Counsel for the appellant submits that the present application was filed against acquittal of respondent in the year 2007 and appeal filed by co-accused who were convicted is pending before this Court.and they have a very good case on merit. Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the judgment of acquittal qua the respondent is well reasoned and leave to appeal should not be granted. He further submits that in case, this Court grants leave to appeal and admit the main appeal, its turn will not come for hearing for decades, as such pendency of the appeal may be treated in-consequential for the respondents. Leave to appeal granted because it has to be heard along with the appeal against conviction.

Counsel for the respondents submits that he be exempted from furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds before the concerned trial Court or Chief Judicial Magistate. He undertakes to surrender before the majesty of Court as and when this Court would direct to do so or in case of reversal of the judgment. Given such undertaking, there shall be no need to furnish bail bonds/surety bonds by the respondents.

Main appeal Admit.

To be heard with CRA-D-934-DB-2006.

It is clarified that the pendency of this appeal shall be in-consequential for any purpose.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 26.11.2025 (SUKHVINDER KAUR) Rajeev (rvs) JUDGE RAJEEV PUROHIT 2025.11.27 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document