Sangeeta v. State Of Punjab And Other

CWP No.4870 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.4870 of 2022 Date of Decision: 11.03.2022 Sangeeta ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and ors.

......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present:- Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate for petitioner. **** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J.

Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter-alia, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization w.e.f. 06.04.2014 in terms of condition No.3 of advertisement dated 23.09.2009 (P-3) read with condition No.8 of the appointment letter dated 09.06.2011 (P-5) as well as policy decision dated 18.07.2012 (P-6).

At the outset, learned counsel, on instructions from petitioner submitted that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, he would be satisfied in case the legal notice dated 15.01.2022 (P-16) is decided expeditiously.

Notice of motion to that limited extent.

SANJAY 2022.03.11 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -1-

CWP No.4870 of 2022 Mr. V.M. Gupta, Addl.A.G., Punjab, who is present through Video-Conference, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents, and raises no objection against the innocuous prayer of the petitioner. In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides, but without going into the merits of the controversy, this writ petition is disposed off with direction to respondent No.2-The Director Public Instruction (Sec.Edu.), Punjab, to consider and decide the aforesaid legal notice dated 15.01.2022 (P-16) in accordance with law by passing speaking order within a period of 03 (three) months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. 11.03.2022 ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU ) sanjay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SANJAY 2022.03.11 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2-