Baljit Singh @ Jeeta v. State Of Haryana

TAPINDER SINGH MANN 2016.05.20 16:59 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Cr. Misc. M 1385 of 2016 Date of decision: 20.5.2016 Baljit Singh @ Jeeta Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana Respondent

Present:

Mr. RS Mamli, Advocate.

Mr. GS Salwara, DAG, Haryana M.M.S.BEDI,J.

The petitioner seeks the concession of bail in a case registered on the basis of the allegations that he along with other coaccused was apprehended by the police while coming on a three wheeler, on the basis of a secret information. The petitioner along with others was found in possession of intoxicating allopathic medicines, salt of which falls under the provisions of NDPS Act.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has nothing to do with the ownership of the three wheeler, which was driven by co-accused Udam Singh.

I have considered the nature of the medicines, recovered from the petitioner, which prima facie fall under ambit of narcotic drugs. On asking of the court, status of the trial has been intimated i.e. 10 prosecution witnesses out of 16 having already been examined. The petition is disposed of with a direction that in case the trial is not concluded within three months by the trial court, after the next date of hearing fixed before it, the trial shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/ surety bonds to its satisfaction. May 20 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE