Paramjit Kaur v. State Ut

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-12896 of 2015 Date of decision : May 27, 2015 Paramjit Kaur ....Petitioner versus State (U.T.) ....Respondent Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. Paramjit Singh Kureel, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Amandeep Singh Gill, Add. PP UT Chandigarh assisted by Mr. Jaideep Verma, Advocate, for the complainant Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) The allegations against Paramjit Kaur in this anticipatory bail application are that she along with her husband Harbhajan Singh have fraudulently enticed and cheated the complainant on the pretext of sending Narinder son of the complainant to Canada for which she has taken a sum of Rs 25 lacs. Neither she took Narinder to Canada nor returned the money. The bail application is opposed by the State counsel on the ground that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is essential to unearth the entire gamit of the nexus and it is vehemently argued on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is employed and in advance age and that there is no substantial evidence to connect her with the commission of offence. DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2015.05.28 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

Criminal Misc. No. M-12896 of 2015 -2In view of the seriousness of the allegations and the fact that the investigations are at crucial stage, custodial interrogation is thus very essential. Moreover, powers under section 438 Cr.P.C. are to be sparingly used. No ground for anticipatory bail is made out. Dismissed.

( Fateh Deep Singh ) May 27, 2015 Judge 'tiwana'

DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2015.05.28 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh