Sonu @ Sukhwinder Singh v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No. 1386 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.4.2018 ...

Sonu ................Petitioner vs.

State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Vinay Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurav Khurana, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel, on instructions from HC Harjit Singh, from Police Station Tanda, District Hoshiarpur, states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and has furnished affidavit that he does not hold any passport, as such the petitioner is not required by the local police for further investigation In these circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 18.1.2018 is made absolute, subject to fulfillment of conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition in that way is allowed.

It is made clear, that in case the petitioner is found violating any terms and conditions, the order granting pre-arrest bail shall be liable to be withdrawn.

( H.S. Madaan ) 19.4.2018 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2018.04.20 16:14 I am the author of this document