Radha & Another v. Ut Of Chandigarh & Others

CRM-M-13048-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-13048 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : April 19, 2017 Radha and another ... Petitioners

VERSUS

UT of Chandigah and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Petitioners in person with Mr. Jagtar Kureel, Advocate.

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) This petition is for seeking protection of life and liberty of petitioners, who alleged to have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 to 6, parents and brother of petitioner No. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his prayer for taking appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 11.04.2017 (Annexure P-7) submitted by petitioners to Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh. It has been stated that both the petitioners are major. The year of birth of petitioner No.1- Radha is 1991 as per copy of Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-3) and that of petitioner No.2- Pinku is 1990 as per copy of Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-4). They got married on 05.04.2017. Photographs of marriage are Annexure P-6.

In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, but without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage of petitioners, petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh, to look into the representation dated Jyoti 2017.04.

CRM-M-13048-2017 -211.04.2017 (Annexure P-7) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office. However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them. (SURINDER GUPTA) April 19, 2017.

JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jyoti 2017.04.19 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH