Lokesh v. State Of Haryana

In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-11815-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:-18.3.2021 Lokesh ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Rajat Mor, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana, assisted by ASI Jitender Kumar.

Mr. Tejpal Singh Dhull, Advocate for the complainant. (proceedings conducted through video conferencing) ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) 1.

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of regular bail in respect of the case registered vide FIR No.394 dated 21.12.2020 at Police Station Rajendra Park, District Gurugram under Sections 392, 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1)(B) of Arms Act, 1959, wherein offence under Section 25(1B) of Arms Act was deleted and offence under Section 27(1) of Arms Act was added later on.

2.

The FIR was lodged at the instance of Naveen Kumar, wherein it is alleged that on 20.12.2020 his car Hyundai Creta bearing registration No.HR-12AL9692 was snatched from him by two boys, who were wearing masks. PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.03.19 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

( 2 ) CRM-M-11815-2021 (O&M) 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is nowhere named in the FIR and that the complainant has furnished affidavit to the effect that he had seen the petitioner and that he has no concern with the offence in question and that he is innocent. He has further stated that he does not wish to initiate any legal proceedings against the innocent person namely Lokesh (petitioner).

4.

Although, the learned State counsel has opposed the petition but today Mr. Tejpal Singh Dhull, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has categorically stated that he has no objection for grant of bail as petitioner is not the accused.

5.

In view of the aforestated position, wherein the complainant has virtually given a clean-chit to the petitioner, the petition is accepted and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.

18.3.2021 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.03.19 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document