Pooja Gupta And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS




    
       Date of decision: 25th May, 2015  Pooja Gupta and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others

Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3.

Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 6.

 !
"#  $ Learned counsel for both the sides have made statements that the petitioners as well as private respondents have compromised the matter and marriage of the petitioners has been duly accepted and acknowledged by their parents.

Learned State counsel on instructions from HC Rampal and on the basis of statements of Pooja Gupta, Som Nath Gupta and RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.26 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    Mohit Gupta, which have been placed on record, states that nothing survives in this petition.

In view thereof the present petition stands dismissed having been rendered infructuous.

#  !
$   %& "  
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.26 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court