← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/5187/2022disposed of

Jiwan Jyoti Polytechnic College v. State Of Punjab And Others

2025-05-05Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi3 pages

     

    !"

!# !

$!!

! !# !



 % 

#&'

() #'* + (

,  - - 

.

/(&

(0/&'*1

* (00'2'3 0004 ---'& & ( '5 6'5+7+ 8&&'

() 7 94  (&1'5+ --- '+:( '

&+  

 

     





     

   

  



  



 



  



  ! "#$%&

'''

 



   !

"#$%"&'"(%()  

  

 

    (   

    )   

 

    ! *  +  ( ) 

, #*-



 

 

)  

    )   

 

    ! *  +  ( ) 

, #*-

 .   )  

 ,  &'")*+$"(%(( 1.

In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioners-institution is that they are entitled for the payment of their dues

under the Post Metric Scholarship Scheme, which is not being refunded to the petitioners.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue raised in the present petition has already been answered by this Court in CWP No.13761 of 2024 titled "Akashdeep and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors." and other connected cases, decided on 09.01.2025 (Annexure P-3) hence, the present petition be also disposed of in the same terms. 3.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 5-Union of India submits that though, the claim raised in the present petition has already been decided by this court while passing order in Akashdeep's case (supra), but Union of India, intends to file an appeal against the said order passed in Akashdeep's case (supra).

4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the case file with their able assistance. 5.

Once, the issue raised in the present petition has already been decided by this Court while passing order in Akashdeep's case (supra), merely that respondent No. 4- Union of India has decided to file an appeal against the said order passed in Akashdeep's case (supra), does not mean that the claim of the petitioners which is akin to one which was raised in Akashdeep's case (supra), should not be disposed of in the same terms so as to avoid discrimination.

6.

Keeping in view facts and circumstances of the present case, the present petition is disposed of in the same terms and conditions as held in Akashdeep's case (supra).

;

7.

Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of.

/  

!

8 ! 8  8 

#