Jagjit Singh And ORS v. Bachan Singh And ANR

Crl.Misc. No.M-17802 of 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl.Misc. No.M-17802 of 2011 Date of Decision : 11.12.2015 Jagjit Singh and others ......Petitioners Vs.

Bachan Singh ......Respondent ...

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ...

Present :

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Tarundeep Kumar, Advocate for Mr. D.S. Pheruman, Advocate for respondent no.1.

...

1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

2. Whether the judgement should be reported in Digest ? RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J Petitioners, by way of instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (`Cr.P.C.' for short) seek quashing of the impugned complaint (Annexure P-1) and also the summoning order (Annexure P-2), however, without availing their equally, efficacious alternative remedy of revision against the impugned summoning order. In view of the above, petitioners are relegated to their equally efficacious, alternative remedy of revision against the impugned summoning order at the first instance, however, with liberty to the petitioners to approach this court again, if necessity arises. It is also made clear that if the petitioners file an appropriate revision petition against the impugned summoning order within a period of six weeks from today, respondent-complainant shall not raise the issue GREESH SAHNI 2015.12.14 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Crl.Misc. No.M-17802 of 2011 of limitation.

Disposed of, accordingly.

11.12.2015 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) GS JUDGE GREESH SAHNI 2015.12.14 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh