← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaRSA/1060/1993dismissed

Smt. Santosh Kumari v. L.I.C. Of India

2025-11-11Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal1 pages

‭2023:PHHC:136695‬ ‭IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA‬ ‭AT CHANDIGARH‬ ‭230‬ ‭RSA-1060-1993 (O&M)‬ ‭Date of decision: 19.10.2023‬ ‭Smt. Santosh Kumari‬ ‭....Appellant‬ ‭Versus‬ ‭LIC of India‬ ‭...Respondent‬ ‭CORAM:‬ ‭HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY‬ ‭*****‬ ‭Present:-‬ ‭None for the appellant‬ ‭Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advocate for‬ ‭Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3‬ ‭*****‬ ‭AMAN CHAUDHARY. J.‬ ‭1.‬ ‭The‬‭present‬‭regular‬‭second‬‭appeal‬‭has‬‭been‬‭filed‬‭against‬‭the‬‭judgment‬ ‭dated‬‭14.09.1992‬‭passed‬‭by‬‭the‬‭lower‬‭Appellate‬‭Court‬‭whereby‬‭the‬‭appeal‬‭against‬ ‭the‬‭judgment‬‭and‬‭decree‬‭dated‬‭30.04.1991‬‭passed‬‭by‬‭learned‬‭SSJ,‬‭Hissar‬‭had‬‭been‬ ‭set aside and dismissed the suit of the plaintiff.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭None‬ ‭had‬ ‭appeared‬‭for‬‭the‬‭appellant‬‭on‬‭20.03.2023‬‭and‬‭25.05.

2023‬ ‭and thus, on the last date, notice was issued to the appellant.‬ ‭3.‬ ‭As‬‭per‬‭office‬‭report,‬‭notice‬‭issued‬‭to‬‭the‬‭appellant‬‭has‬‭been‬‭received‬ ‭back‬ ‭served‬ ‭through‬ ‭his‬ ‭son-in-law‬ ‭(on‬ ‭Whatsapp).‬ ‭However,‬ ‭there‬ ‭is‬ ‭no‬ ‭representation on his behalf, despite the case having been called out twice.‬ ‭4.‬ ‭It‬‭appears‬‭that‬‭the‬‭appellant‬‭is‬‭not‬‭interested‬‭in‬‭pursuing‬‭the‬‭present‬ ‭appeal.‬ ‭5.‬ ‭Dismissed for non-prosecution.‬ ‭6.‬ ‭Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant.‬ ‭7.‬ ‭A period of three months is granted for seeking recalling of this order.‬ ‭(AMAN CHAUDHARY)‬ ‭JUDGE‬ ‭October 19, 2023‬ ‭M.Kamra‬ ‭Whether speaking/reasoned‬ ‭:‬ ‭Yes / No‬ ‭Whether reportable‬ ‭:‬ ‭Yes / No‬ MOHIT 2023.10.