High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/1337/2015dismissed

Naveen Arora And Others v. State Of Haryana

2015-07-20Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri2 pages

Criminal Misc. No.M-1337 of 2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.M.No.M-1337 of 2015 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 20.7.2015 Naveen Arora and others PETITIONERS

VERSUS

State of Haryana RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER

1. Whether reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present:- Shri Mukesh Yadav, Advocate or the petitioners. Shri Anmol Malik, A.A.G. Haryana.

Shri N.S.Shekhawat, Advocate for the complainant. MAHESH GROVER, J.

This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing F.I.R. No.645 dated 22.12.2014 registered under Sections 370,376,366,384,385, 467,468,469,471,496,506,120-B I.P.C. at Police Station Mahendergarh. Petitioner No.1 alleges that he had got married to the complainant and in view of the marriage, the allegations of rape under Section 376 I.P.C. etc. GHANSHYAM DASS 2015.07.22 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document high court chandigarh

Criminal Misc. No.M-1337 of 2015 -2cannot be sustained. Reply on behalf of the State has been filed.

Learned counsel representing the complainant seriously disputes the contention raised by the counsel for the petitioners about marriage. He states that the complainant was forced into marriage by blackmail as her objectionable pictures had been obtained by petitioner No.1 which were used by him to further his diabolic designs.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and noticing that the F.I.R. discloses the commission of a very serious offence, this Court would not accept the plea of innocence of the petitioners. It is a settled principle of law that if the F.I.R. discloses the commission of a serious offence, the Court would not venture to quash the proceedings.

No grounds.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for permission to withdraw the petition. Allowed to do so.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

(MAHESH GROVER) July 20, 2015 JUDGE GD GHANSHYAM DASS 2015.07.22 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document high court chandigarh