Rajinder Singh v. State Of Hy.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-10673-2003 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 RAJINDER SINGH

...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- None for the petitioner Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside order dated nil (Annexure P-13) whereby petitioner was ordered to be compulsorily retired.

2.

The petitioner by impugned orders was retired on completing 25 years' service. The orders were passed 24 years back. There seems no reason to set aside impugned orders at this stage. 3.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 4.

Dismissed with liberty to petitioner to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives. 5.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE September 24th, 2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.24 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document