Seema v. State Of Punjab
CRM-M-10548-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10548-2025 Decided on: 05.05.2025 Seema
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:
Mr. S.S. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Jasdev Singh Thind, DAG, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No.
Dated Police Station Sections 18.06.2024 Division No.8, 21(c), 27A, 25 & 29 of NDPS Jalandhar Act 1.
The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above has come before this Court seeking regular bail under Section 483 BNSS.
2.
In para 15 of the petition, petitioner has mentioned that two more FIRs are against her. However, as per custody certificate dated 04.05.2025, five cases are pending except the present one.
3.
At this stage, petitioner's counsel submits that non-mentioning of complete criminal history was un-intentional and it is due to lack of communication and lack of awareness of petitioner's family. He seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh after disclosing complete criminal history. 4.
Given above, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with the liberty to file a fresh after disclosing all criminal antecedents relating to any part of India or abroad. It is clarified that this Court shall not draw any adverse inference against the petitioner for non-disclosing of criminal history. It is further clarified that power of attorney filed in ANJU RANI 2025.05.08 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
CRM-M-10548-2025 the present case shall suffice and there shall be no need to file fresh power of attorney in the fresh petition, if filed and Registry shall not raise any objection. All pending applications, if any, stand closed.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 05.05.2025 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes Whether reportable:
No.
ANJU RANI 2025.05.08 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh