Randhir Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab & ORS




    
    

  Date of decision: 22nd September, 2015  Randhir Singh and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others  Respondents     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Simranjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.

None for respondents No.2 & 3.

 "
# Report dated 20.08.2015 of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sunam (Sangrur) has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Mahant Ram Dass and injured Sant Sham Sunder Dass @ Ram Sunder Dass and the accused persons namely Randhir Singh and Janak Raj, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Heard.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.03.03 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   The lone injury which is opined to be dangerous to life admittedly is on the non8vital part of the body and even otherwise applicability of Section 307 IPC is a debatable issue besides the fact that the accused and the injured/complainant are residents of the same village. Reliance has been sought to be placed on $%&'()* *(*+*'(,-&).+",*,&-*)/-*'(*'(*',-&) 

012"  In view of the aforesaid and in the light of the satisfaction shown by the learned Court, the fact that parties belong to the same very village, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in $4*'"4'%-+",*,& 5'6*7*'( *',-&) 

 02   0)484'*92  and $:59;4'(&) "4'%- *'( ,-&). + ",*,&  5'6*7 *'( *',-&) 

 02   0)484'*92 

#the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.100 dated 27.09.2014 registered at Police Station Cheema, District Sangrur under Sections 307/309/506/120B IPC and Section 25/54/59A of the Arms Act and all consequences arising out of the said FIR against the present petitioners are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

 "
2   "&<,&87&)

#

 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.03.03 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court