Surinder Kumar v. Jagjit Singh Etc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1441-2016 DATE OF DECISION :-February 6, 2018 SURINDER KUMAR

...Petitioner

Versus

JAGJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashish Grover, Advocate, respondent No.1.

Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG, Punjab.

*** There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that the petitioner has since been convicted and sentenced by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bathinda, vide judgment dated 09.10.2017. He has placed on record a photocopy of that judgment.

It being so, the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of complaint and summoning order has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE February 6, 2018 neeraj Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No