Seema Aggarwal v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-14462 of 2016 Date of decision : November 28, 2016 Seema Aggarwal ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. KS Nalwa, Advocate with Mr. S.K. Sahijpal, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent Mr. Sandeep Suri, Advocate, for the complainant Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) Learned State Counsel, on instructions from SI Krishan Kumar, submits that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. At this juncture, Mr. Sandeep Suri, Advocate, counsel for the complainant has intervened to bring to the notice of this Court that the other side is trying to put forth a proposal and does not actually oppose the grant of bail and which fact is not denied by Mr. Nalwa.

In the light of the aforesaid and the fact that custodial interrogation is not required in this case, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 16.5.2016 is made absolute till submission of Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.11.29 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Criminal Misc. No. M-14462 of 2016 -2report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. With these observations, the present petition stands disposed off. ( Fateh Deep Singh ) November 28, 2016 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.11.29 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.