Kishor @Rinku v. State Of Haryana




    
    

  Date of decision: 30th July, 2015  Kishor @ Rinku

Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

Respondent     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. M.S. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana.

 "
#$ !% Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.218 dated 23.05.2014 registered at Police Station City Bahadurgarh under Sections 498A/406/323/34 IPC.

Vide order dated 28.04.2015 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioner was granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.
Learned State Counsel, on instructions from HC Narender, Police Station City Bahadurgarh submits that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and is no longer required for further RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.30 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 28.04.2015 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

The petition stands disposed off accordingly. $  "
%   &'( #

   RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.30 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court