Subhash Yadav And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS
Date of decision: 21st January, 2016 Subhash Yadav and others
Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
Respondents 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana.
! Report dated 20.02.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurgaon has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Sonu, injured Kuldeep and Bhagat Singh, and the accused persons namely Subhash Yadav, Dharambir, Ramesh, Surender @ Lala and Rakesh, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.
Heard.
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.02.19 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties belong to the same very village and the offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in "#$% #%&' ( )$)* +%,$- $%. $%)'*/
012 0/#3#%$42 1 and "5+46#%.*/ #%&' $%. )'*/7 ( )$)* +%,$- $%. $%)'*/ 8 02 0/#3#%$42 ! the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.448 dated 19.07.2014 registered at Police Station Sector 10, District Gurgaon, Haryana under Sections 148/149/186/323/353/506 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR qua the petitioners are quashed.
The petition stands allowed in those terms.
0 2 $%+$/9 ! : RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.02.19 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court