Ashwani Kumar Chawla @ Ashwani Chawla v. State Of Haryana And ANR
! " # $ % ' ('
! " # # $ " )"
($*+') +(
%&'())%*+,%&-"
*%.
"
&((,
*-./
'
' 0 0 12 "3 *' ' $ 4 ."+ *' " $ $0+- '
'+ - '
' /6 /40 '
' 7 + ' $ 07 /* 5 .
+771+8/.3+ " $ - '
'+ - '
' ' 5, ('* * 5 ( 9 ' ( ' ( ( ' ' '$07/.
+)+'
*('&
+( '
( '('
5 ' *'-. ' $ 4 ." *' * % ) 5' ) ( ''( '5
+ 5'
)'''
' 4
% )' ''
' 4
( '5& '
:.+ - '
'+ 5 '
)
( '5( %
''
+( ( *'-.*' '$4 '5*5
( / 4 $
:
+'' ;+% + (5 $ % ' ( * &' ' ( '(+(
-.*' *' * '$4."+ ' ' (( 5 & 5
"
$*+ ') + ( 5 (' / ' ''
5 ( '5( '
'&5'
% 5<+-. ' *,
' . ) ' ( '( ''.
(( (-. *''
((
( ' ( '()'''
'
0 '5 +
' '
This Court time and again has held that when the main proceedings under Section 138 of NI Act stand compromised, then the continuation of FIR and proceedings under Section 174-A of IPC on account of petitioner having been declared as proclaimed person would be nothing but an abuse of the process of law. This view was taken by the
0 coordinate Bench of this Court in a case titled as "Ashok Madan vs. State of Haryana and another" reported as 2020(4) RCR (Criminal) 87, "Anil Kumar Versus Jitender Kumar and another", CRM-M-5878- 2022 decided on 06.04.2022 and "Varinder Kumar @ Virender Kumar Versus State of Haryana and another", CRM-M-42551-2021 decided on 19.04.2022. 7 $+=(*) 5) ' + '
5+( ' ( '( ' + -. *'6'( 5( 5 ' '
)& '&5'
('* '$4." 5 (
'( '&5 )' ) '5( (*) '+ -./
'
'0 012 "3*' ' $ 4 ."+ *' " $ $ 0+ - '
'+
- '
' '* ' '
' 0 ( ' 5& ':.+- '
'+5 +(-. '*'
' , ('* * + ,
' 5< +
> 5'('
& ? ' & 5 ' @ ' A "( + $ + '* 5&( (''
& '
&6 ('' (* '*'(5 ':.+- '
' (' '
& '
& 7 /' & ( ( &
' ( & ' '+ ' ' * '
'
4
0 *-., ' '( ( '5' ' )5' ' 6( ''('(&'5 '
# $
""
B$( =*> '
C>/ B( 5 C>/