Ashok Kumar v. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.16322 of 2003 Date of Decision.20.02.2015 Ashok Kumar .......Petitioner

Versus

DHBVNL and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate for Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate for the respondents.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) For detailed order, see order passed in CWP No.16239 of 2003 of even date.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE February 20, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.02.24 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document