Kalu Ram & ORS v. State Of Haryana & ANR

CRM-M-13547-2015 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13547-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 31, 2015 Kalu Ram and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.Sunil Sihag, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Kuldeep Tiwari, Addl.A.G.Haryana.

Mr.Karan Sidhu, Advocate for Mr.Sonpreet Singh Brar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 6.

Mr.Pawan Girdhar, Advocate for the informant.

........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the charge-sheet (challan) has been produced before learned trial Court, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioners to make all the submissions before the Court below as enshrined in Section 239, Cr.P.C. MEENU 2015.11.02 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-13547-2015 (O&M) -2Learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the respondents and Mr.Pawan Girdhar, Advocate for the informant, have no objection to the above prayer. Ordered accordingly.

In view of the above, Mr.Pawan Girdhar, Advocate, for the informant does not press CRM-34966-2015.

October 31, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.11.02 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh