Ravi Dutt And ORS. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

 







 









 



 






 








 









 !
"#
!$%&%"'(
)* )*

+






























 














 


  



 
 








































  


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA







!"


#!
$
%%!




!$%
&
'
&












TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA



The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the order, dated 28.02.2000, Annexure P-11, relieving the petitioners as part-time Water Carriers in the Schools under the respondent Department.
2.

Learned State counsel contends that petitioners were appointed as Water Carriers for one and a half hour per day on DC rate/ daily wage, on year to year basis, and their services were terminated on 28.02.2003. Thereafter, the Department did not grant sanction for appointment of Water Carriers for the year 2003-04 because water facility had been provided in every school in terms of directions issued by this Court in CWP-3774-2000, obviating the need for appointment of part-time Water Carriers.
Seema 2025.04.29 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

 







 

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to dispute any of the facts aforementioned, nor have the petitioners challenged their termination dated 28.02.2003.
4.

It is, therefore, apparent that the petitioners' services as part-time Water Carriers were terminated for a valid reason on 28.02.2003, which has not even been challenged by them.
5.

Accordingly, finding no merit in the petition, it stands dismissed.
















TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
()*)(*(+












 










  




 


Seema 2025.04.29 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document