Narotam @ Babbu v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13606 of 2015(O&M) Date of Decision: 29.4.2015 Narotam alias Babbu --Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Haryana and others --Respondent.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Mr. Paramajit Singh Jammu, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL) Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this Court by way of instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed by the respondent authorities, he finally approached respondent No.3 by way of self contained representation Annexure P-3 which was sent by a registered post on 3.9.2013, but the same is also pending decision. He further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.3 is directed to consider and decide his representation, within a reasonable time.

AMIT KUMAR 2015.04.29 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-13606 of 2015(O&M) Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, lest it should prejudice the rights of either of the parties, the Superintendent of Police, Sirsa-respondent No.3 is directed to look into the matter, consider the grievance of the petitioner, raised vide his representation dated Annexure P-3 and decide the same, at an early date by passing an appropriate order thereon, strictly in accordance with law, but in any case within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With the abovesaid observations made and directions issued, present petition stands disposed of.

(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE 29.4.2015 Ak Sharma AMIT KUMAR 2015.04.29 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document