Milap Chand v. Mohinder Etc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-3911-2000 (O&M) Decided on :03.07.2025 MILAP CHAND . .Petitioners

Versus

H.L.S. AUTHORITY, DISTRICT KARNAL AND OTHERS . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: None for the petitioner.

Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Naveen Jhojholia, Advocate for Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1.

In the present petition, vide order dated 24.04.2025 notice was issued to the petitioner, as the earlier counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has been elevated to the Bench of this Court. 2.

As per the report of the registry, notice issued to the petitioner is received back unserved with the report that the petitioner is not residing at the given address.

3.

Keeping in view the aforesaid fact, as no one is appearing on behalf of the petitioner, no further proceedings can be undertaken in the absence of the petitioner, hence, the present petition is dismissed for nonRIYA 2025.07.04 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-3911-2000 (O&M) -2prosecution with liberty to the petitioner to revive the present petition by filing an appropriate application, in case, he intends to do so. 4.

Ordered accordingly.

5.

Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of.

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 03.07.2025 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No RIYA 2025.07.04 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document