Rahul Grover & ORS v. State Of Punjab
CRM-M No.13732 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.13732 of 2017 Date of Decision.11.08.2017 Rahul Grover and others ........Petitioners Vs State of Punjab ........Respondent
Present:
Mr. Harvinder Singh Maan, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Daldeep Singh Sukarchakia, DAG, Punjab.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Avtar Singh, IO, submits that in pursuance of the interim order dated 21.04.2017, which reads as under, the petitioners have joined the investigation:- "Learned counsel, inter alia, contends that all the petitioners are students and have been falsely implicated in the present case by the complainant. In fact, complainant's daughter and petitioner No.1 had a love affair, which was opposed by the complainant and her other family members.
Notice of motion for 11.08.2017.
Meanwhile, the petitioners are directed to join the investigation as and when called by the Investigating Officer. In the event of their arrest, they shall be released on bail by the Investigating Officer on their furnishing bail bonds/sureties to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions mentioned below, as envisaged in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C:- i. a condition that the persons shall make themselves available for interrogation by Police Officer as and when required; ii. a condition that the persons shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any persons acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
iii. a condition that the persons shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court;
PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.08.11 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M No.13732 of 2017 -2iv. such other condition as may be imposed under sub section (3) of Section 437, as if the bail was granted under that section." Keeping in view the aforementioned fact, the order dated 21.04.2017 is made absolute and the petition stands disposed of. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 11, 2017 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.08.11 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document