Jaidev Singla v. State Of Haryana & ANR




    
        Date of decision: 21st September, 2015  Jaidev Singla

Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

Respondents     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate for Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana. for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 "
#$ !% Report dated 01.06.2015 of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kalka has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Rajesh Kumar as well as the accused namely Jaidev Singla, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine and has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure. RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.21 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



  Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties belong to the same very area and the offences for which the accused has been hauled up are not of heinous nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in &'() "')*+ , "-(-.   /)0(1 ()2 ()-+.3 

 $4%   $3'5')(6% 4 and &7/68')2.3 "')*+ ()2 -+.39 , "-(-.   /)0(1 ()2 ()-+.3   $%   $3'5')(6% 

# the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.50 dated 14.03.2015 registered at Police Station Pinjore, District Panchkula under Sections 323/452/506 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

$  "
%   ".:-.51.3 #  
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.21 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court