Nalin Tayal & ANR v. State Of Punjab & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13732 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.4.2015 Er. Nalin Tayal and another --Petitioners.

Vs.

State of Punjab and others --Respondents.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Mr. Naresh Jain, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL) Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioners have approached this Court by way of instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that when the grievance of the petitioners was not being redressed by the respondent authorities, they finally approached respondent No.3 by way of self contained representation dated 7.2.2015 (Annexure P-8), but the same is also pending decision. He further submits that the petitioners will be satisfied in case respondent No.3 is directed to consider and decide their representation, within a reasonable time. AMIT KUMAR 2015.04.30 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-13732 of 2015 (O&M) Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, lest it should prejudice the rights of either of the parties, the Commissioner of Police, Punjab-respondent No.3 is directed to look into the matter, consider the grievance of the petitioner, raised vide their representation dated 7.2.2015 (Annexure P-8) and decide the same, at an early date by passing an appropriate order thereon, strictly in accordance with law, but in any case within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With the abovesaid observations made and directions issued, present petition stands disposed of.

(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE 30.4.2015 Ak Sharma AMIT KUMAR 2015.04.30 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document