Pritam Kaur v. Amar Kaur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RSA No. 955 of 1990 Date of decision: 20.10.2015 Pritam Kaur ..... Appellant

Versus

Smt. Amar Kaur and another ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None for the appellant.

Mr. KS Cheema, Advocate for respondent No. 1. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 has submitted that despite his best efforts, his client could not locate the whereabouts of the appellant.

Efforts were also made to serve the appellant in person, but as per office report, Court notice sent to her was received back unserved for want of correct/complete address. Hence, finding no other option, this appeal is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecution. October 20, 2015 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE RISHU KATARIA 2015.11.02 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document