Priyanka v. Yogesh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.111 Date of Decision: 29.01.2025 PRIYANKA ....Applicant

Versus

YOGESH .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
 

 

   

          



!   
  

   "#     

" !       

% &  % 

' (  )      ! 

% 

   # *         +#    !  t is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 21.05.2022. However, the marriage was never consumated. On account of the matrimonial discord, the parties are residing separate. The applicant has no source of earning and is dependent upon her parents. Even, she has filed the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., which is pending in the Courts at

Jind and the respondent is making appearance in the same. Besides the same, it is submitted that the respondent is facing trial, in the FIR bearing No.205 dated 09.11.2023, under Sections 323, 34, 406, 498-A and 506 IPC, got lodged by the applicant at Women Police Station, District Jind, in the Courts at Jind. In these circumstances, it is submitted that it is difficult for the applicant to commute a distance of about 180 kilometres, to defend the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. On the contrary, the counsel for the respondent contests the application. He submits that it shall be too harsh for the respondent also, if the transfer application is allowed.

It is pertinent to mention that convenience ought to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications, relating to the matrimonial dispute. However, the same is not a thumb rule. The various other circumstances, spelt out from the material brought on record, also ought to be taken into consideration. The distance between Chandigarh and Jind is about 180 kilometres and the transfer application, if so allowed, shall definitely cause inconvenience to the respondent also. Considering the same, it shall be appropriate if the divorce petition is transferred to a mid place i.e. Kaithal.

In view of the aforesaid fact situation, the transfer application is partly allowed and      





! 
 

"#  

" !    % ! &

 % 

' ,  +!  +  " # %  +   ! % -

  !" &    

-    "

"# $%# & ! .   (!,  * .   (!, !     !, /+ !    " !, !   %

%

#

 (ARCHANA PURI) 29.01.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No