Gulshan Kumar v. M.C. Sonepat

AT CHANDIGARH **** SAO-36-1990 Date of Decision.:06.08.2024 Gulshan Kumar Appellant Vs.

M.C. Sonepat Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

Present:

None for the appellant.

Ms. Prerna Malhotra, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) As noced in the order dated 25.04.2024, the case file pertaining to the present SAO has since been burnt and was required to be re-constructed. No document whatsoever, either the paper-book or the impugned order passed by any of the Court below, is available. The only detail available with the Court is the tle of the case as "Gulshan Kumar v. M.C. Sonepat" and that it was filed through Mr. S.K. Bansal, Advocate.

Noce earlier issued to Mr. S.K. Bansal, Advocate received back with the report that he had expired wayback in 2014.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that despite all possible efforts, no details of the case could be found in the records of Municipal Corporaon, Sonepat.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court is le7 with no other opon but to dispose of the present SAO-36-1990, with liberty to the appellant so as to get the ma;er revived in case any cause of acon survives. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE August 06, 2024 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.08.06 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document