Paitu Ram v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15079-2022 Date of Decision: 28.07.2022 Paitu Ram ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ........ Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. S.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajat Gautam, D.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Abhishek Bansal, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 10. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for directing the official respondents not to call the petitioner and his family members in the police station on the complaint of private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied in case directions be issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 08.03.2022 (Annexure P-4) within the time bound manner.

The prayer being innocuous is not opposed by the learned State counsel. Given above, respondent No. 2-Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar to decide the representation dated 08.03.2022 (Annexure P-4) by passing a speaking and reasoned order within thirty working days from today. In case, the grievance of the petitioner still exists, he shall be at liberty to avail legal remedy in accordance with law including approaching this Court. Petition is allowed to the extent above. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 28.07.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.08.02 09:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document