Narinder Battan And ORS v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ANR




    
       Date of decision: 29th May, 2015  Narinder Battan and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of U.T. Chandigarh and another  Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. G.S. Chahal, APP UT Chandigarh for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 !
"#  $ Report dated 25.05.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Rita and the accused persons namely Narinder Battan and Kamla Devi, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure. Heard.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.29 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure matrimonial dispute, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for the betterment of their future life and in view of the law laid down in %&'(!&()*+!,',-

.(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2  #3$   #2&4&('5$ 3 and %6.57&(1-2 !&()* '(1 ,*-28 + !,',-  .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2 

9 #$   #2&4&('5$ 

" the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.232 dated 02.10.2009 registered at Police Station Sector 26, Chandigarh under Sections 406, 498:A IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

#  !
$   ':"  
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.29 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court