Ved Parkash, Headmaster v. State Of Haryana

CWP-4242-2000 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4242-2000 Date of Decision: 31.07.2024 Ved Parkash

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- None for the petitioner Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana *** TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the benefit of pay fixation to the petitioner at the stage it has been given to his juniors in the cadre, and not to withdraw annual increment already granted with effect from 01.04.1994. 2.

Learned State counsel contends that the claimed relief has already been granted to the petitioner by reviewing/rectifying his pay fixation as per the Rules. The written statement to that effect is as under: ...Now after reviewed/rectified pay fixation, orders have also been issued for recovery as per Rules. As such the present petition is not maintainable against respondent No. 1,2 and 4 because the pay of the petitioner and other two juniors as mentioned in the writ petition, which was wrongly fixed by the concerned DDOs inadvertantly, has now been reviewed/rectified as per provisions of pay Rules of pb. C.S.R. Vol. 1 part-1 and PAYAL 2024.08.01 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-4242-2000 -2directions of recovery to the concerned DDOs has also been issued and now there is no discrepency in the pay fixation of the petitioner and other two juniors i.e. Respondent No. 3 and Shri S.K. Garcha. 3.

In view thereof, the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 31.07.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2024.08.01 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment