Pritam Singh Alias Kaka v. State Of Punjab
!
"#$#%&'
( )*
& +,-.-
-
!
"# ! !!$ %%%
-*/,0& # '()** && +, &- .
+,/ 0 &# # 27.06.2019 Sadar Kapurthala 363 and 366A of Indian Penal Code, (for short 'IPC') 1 2# #&" & +,- # (3( (33,* # 4# & 56 -
& &&
56 -
& - 4 ) *& #"
"# 7883187)9 1383187) 7 88 &
- 4 4: ; - &"&
# - # -44 - & -4 1 =8 888>. & & - & ! +, " # - - "# # 73'**-# #& -
- ## 4 &4 & +? 4 0& - 4 4 $ - 4 & #& &
$ - -4 -
&45@6 -
& , 0# 1811
- -4 - # #&
# # =1**- - #&
#& 78781818:- 8A87181' &4
# &# #:
"
&# & & &*- #
- " 7B81181' ( 4
4 # & &&4 &# #, # "#- &"- - 8)711811 - " " & - " - &#-
##&& +,-&
# " &&&4/& -& " 4 # 4 Therefore, it is argued that he deserves to be extended benefit of bail. Along with the petition, he had annexed Annexure P-2 copy of a marriage certificate shown to be issued by Manav Sewa Trust, Fatehabad to the effect that the prosecutrix had performed marriage with Pardeep Kumar on 09.12.2022 and Annexure P-3 copy of an affidavit shown to be sworn by the prosecutrix submitting that her grand father had lodged a false case against the petitioner and she had no concern with him and she had solemnized marriage with Pardeep Kumar. ' 4 .
##&& : # -4 #< 4- 4 &#& &# &&" $ -
, #4# " # "&& - 4 #< "&&- B , " & # & -&&&
# &# && "
#
#&&4 3 && -4 #<- - 4& 7883187) &-& >
- - - 4 4
& $ - #<- #" # # 4 -
#< ; &4 , #
# 73'** - " -
- # -4 - 4
&# -&$ - 4
- - &4 "#& " - 4
#< # - # "& 4 && ; " " - " - :-" #4 "# # 4 * &* ; " # # #< &- 4 < &* && - "&"
#<4 #
- # &" #< $ -" "& #4
-" #& #& #& &4 8A87181' # # #< # < & "- # " , #& &
"&&- !## &4 A ,#& " " && # < # = #
&# 4 # 1
-2 'th )*