Gurdial Singh & Anrs. v. Kirpal Singh & ORS.

YOGESH SHARMA 2018.12.11 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-1232-1992 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1232-1992 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.12.2018 Gurdial Singh (deceased) through LRs and another ... Appellants

Versus

Kirpal Singh (deceased) through LRs and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

None.

*** AMIT RAWAL, J.

This Court vide order dated 27.09.2018 had issued the notice to the appellants and the respondents.

As per office report, appellant Nos.1(i), 2(i), 2(iii), (ii) have been served, but there is no representation on their behalf, whereas appellant Nos.1(iii), 1(iv) and 2(iv), remain unserved. The present regular second appeal is directed against the concurrent findings of fact, whereby the suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction, was dismissed by the trial Court and affirmed by the lower Appellate Court. It appears that the appellants must have resiled with the factual aspect.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

10.12.2018 Yogesh Sharma ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No