← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/1994/2023disposed of

Eman Bano And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

2023-03-02Mr. Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill2 pages

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRWP-1994-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:-2.3.2023 Eman Bano and another ... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Talim Hussain, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) 1.

Petitioner No.1 - Eman Bano aged about 25 years and petitioner No.2 - Shoyab aged about 21 years, who are both 'Muslim' by religion, seek issuance of a direction to the official respondents to protect their lives and liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of private respondents, having married against the wishes of their families. While this is the first marriage of petitioner No.1 - Eman Bano, the petitioner No.2 - Shoyab is stated to be already married to Anjum daughter of Deen Mohammad.

2.

Without commenting as regards the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also as regards the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 - Superintendent of Police, Nuh, District Nuh, Haryana, to look into the matter and to dispose off the representation dated 18.2.2023 (Annexure P-4) in PANKAJ KAKKAR 2023.03.02 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

( 2 ) CRWP-1994-2023 (O&M) accordance with law. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the lives and liberty of the petitioners, then necessary steps warranted under law be taken thereupon at the earliest so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.

3.

A copy of this order alongwith copy of the representation dated 18.2.2023 (Annexure P-4) be sent to respondent No.2 - Superintendent of Police, Nuh, District Nuh, Haryana so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously. 4.

It is, however, clarified that the aforesaid order shall not be taken to be any expression as regards the validity of marriage of the petitioners and shall not confer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that they have committed any wrong.

2.3.2023 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2023.03.02 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document