Sukhna Paper Mills v. Piara Singh Etc

2023:PHHC:068176

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.26 of 1993 Date of decision:11.05.2023 .... Appellant

Versus

PYARA SINGH AND OTHERS .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present :

None for the appellant.

Mr. Bawa Karanveer, Advocate for Mr. Aman Bahri, Advocate for the respondents. **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) As per office report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back unserved with the report that no such person as mentioned therein, is residing at the given address whereas, notice issued to Mr. Deepak Suri, Advocate who was previously representing the appellant, received back unserved with the report that he is not dealing with this case any more. Since none has appeared on behalf of the appellant despite repeated calls, therefore, it appears that the appellant is not interested to pursue the present appeal.

Hence, the present appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.

(MANISHA BATRA) 11.05.2023 JUDGE Jyoti-IV Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No.

Whether reportable :

Yes/No JYOTI 2023.05.17 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment